what is the moderation paradigm and what critiques does netterstrom have of it

1. Netterstrøm discusses a few of the ways in which scholars have tried to understand Islamist groups and their relationship with democracy. What is the moderation paradigm, and what critiques does Netterstrøm have of it?

2. How and why did Ennahda end up compromising in Tunisia, according to Netterstrøm?

3. What does this case tell us about the larger issues of fundamentalist religious groups and democracy, do you think?

4. What were the two paths taken by Somalia and Somaliland, according to Krug?

5. Why does Krug think a large part of the problem for Somalia is foreign intervention? What do you think of her argument?