Research paper (3-5 pages) on {Why was Mahatma Gandhi killed and by whom?} only the draft is due by this wednesday, the final one is due on 05/04 – professionalessaybuddy.com | Professional Essay Buddy
Research paper (3-5 pages) on {Why was Mahatma Gandhi killed and by whom?} only the draft is due by this wednesday, the final one is due on 05/04 – professionalessaybuddy.com | Professional Essay Buddy
Professional Essay Buddy – History Assignment Help
Requirements: The paper should be 3 – 5 pages in length. The font must be 12-point Times New Roman, double-spaced with default Microsoft Word margins (1.25’’ left and right). Please include page numbers and a cover page. You must cite your work using either the Chicago Manual of Style or MLA format, and include a bibliography. File format should be in either.docx or .doc (Microsoft Word).For more information of the Chicago Manual of Style, visit:http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.htmlFor more information on MLA, visit: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/01/Your paper must contain information from at least three sources of evidence. Two of these sources must be scholarly books, and the remainder may be comprised of newspaper articles, peer-reviewed journals, document collections, presidential papers, etc. If you would like to use information from a website, please check with your Teaching Assistant or the professor to ensure the website is appropriate for an academic project – but remember that the idea of this assignment is to engage in research rather than simply searching the internet for information. Please note that Wikipedia is not an acceptable source to use for this paper and will not count toward the required two sources.Grading Criteria: Papers will be assessed on the quality of your argument, the use of sources/evidence, spelling and grammar, and formatting (this includes citations). See the final page of this handout for a rubric which details the methods used to grade the paper.Guidelines: The following guidelines should ensure that you meet the above grading criteria. For a typical research paper – the “who,” the “what,” the “where,” the “when,” and the “why” – these are the most basic elements. When you write your paper, keep these requirements in mind and double-check to make sure each is represented in your final draft.Who: This question may seem simple if you are covering a king, but what if you are covering a movement (ex. political revolution in the West) or a time period (ex. the 15th century) or an event (ex. the Spanish Inquisition)? Who led the movement? Who was at the event? It is important that you clearly define who is involved with your topic. Do not state that “people” felt a certain way or that “people” wanted change. Be specific, and avoid generalities. “People” is about as general as you can get. Remember, you are trying to make arguments about history, trends, and events. Being able to define ‘who’ is crucial in understanding and analyzing history. This also goes for your citations. If you are commenting on or using the words of a political scientist, historian, social critic, analyst, or another reputable source, make sure you specific who they are and why we should take them seriously.What: Be sure to describe the event, controversy, or debate that you are covering. While you should not spend a great deal of time on summary, there has to be some description of the problem or situation. This helps provide context, explaining to your audience what happened and why it is something to be studied in depth.What, Part 2: What are you trying to say? What is your argument? You have researched your topic. Make a bold argument and support it with evidence! This is the most crucial part of the research paper. Examples of poor arguments: “Government helps people”; “I don’t like Henry VIII”; “the Americans are good” Those are not arguments at all becausethey simply make overgeneralized statements or are only reciting dates and facts. Appropriate alternatives might be: “The role of the government in America evolved over time and reflected changes and beliefs of the citizenry”; “Western philosophy was significant – but problematic – in Europe”; “Henry VIII made a series of decisions that led to problems for his subjects.”Where: It may appear to be basic information, but geography can play an important role in discussing your topic. Say you are comparing the American and French revolutions. It would be valuable to note the geographical variations that may affect these entities. Make sure the reader knows where you’re talking about.When: Again, think about this in terms of providing context. Make sure you situate your topic in terms of its chronology. This is especially important as governments, rulers, and empires – and subsequent political trends, concepts, and ideas – have changed over time. What else was going on? Situate your argument in both time and space.Why: Literally, why is your topic important? Why should the reader care? Why is it significant enough to research? This is the most basic question historians and political scientists have to ask themselves when they set out to write a book, dissertation or article. In this research paper, you are a scholar. You need to convince your reader that your topic is worth talking about through strong arguments and evidence.ExceptionalAveragePoorArgument: How wellPaper makes a clearPaper makes anPaper makes noconstructed is theargument whichargument which may beargument, lacksargument? Is it cleardiscusses a point ofunclear or lacks focus.substantive attempts tothroughout the paper?analysis. Paper isHowever, the argumentprovide a clear thesis.Does it make ansupported by evidence.is generally consistentMay simply be aanalytical point?40 ptsthroughout the paper. 30recitation facts about anptsevent.0 – 20 ptsUse of Evidence: DoesPaper makes clear usePaper makes use ofPaper makes little or nothe paper support theof evidence, with nosome evidence, thoughuse of evidence.argument withless than three sources,at least three sources areEvidence is notevidence? Are theretwo of which areused. May not beappropriate for anclearly three sources?scholarly books.scholarly.academic paper.Are the sources30 pts20 pts0 – 15 ptsappropriate?Spelling andPaper is error-free andPaper may have minorPaper is writtenGrammar: Has thethe writing has beengrammatical errors.carelessly with severalpaper been proofread?well-crafted andWriting is generallyerrors.Is it largely error-free?thoughtful.consistent.10 pts5 pts0 ptsFormatting (citations,Paper is properlyPaper is formattedPaper has majorspacing, etc.): Is theformatted. Citations arecorrectly for the mostformatting errors, maypaper double-spaced?found in footnotes orpart. Citations may benot be double-spaced,Are the Chicago-styleendnotes. The paper isparenthetical or may beand may not contain anycitations (or somewritten in an academicincorrectly added, butcitations. Paper iscomparable academictone. Paper is theare present. Paper iswritten in asystem) used? Is theappropriate length.written in an academicconversational orpaper in a suitable font-20 ptstone. Paper is theinformal tone. Papertype? Is the paper moreappropriate length.may be shorter thanacademic or10 ptsrequired.conversational? Is the0 – 10 ptspaper at least 5 pages inlength?
Order Now and Get Assistance in Your Assignments From World’s No.1 Assignment Help Company. We Provide Help with All Types of Assignments. Let professionals take care of your academic papers.
Place Order Now
